Are AI filters becoming stricter than society itself?

23 points by tsevis 13 hours ago

While experimenting with digital art and AI tools, I noticed how aggressively filters block historical, political, or artistic imagery. I wrote about how this impacts art, research, and cultural memory. Curious how others here see this balance between safety and censorship. https://tsevis.com/censorship-ai-and-the-war-on-context

Nextgrid 6 hours ago

It’s the diversity and inclusion slippery slope again.

The initial idea was good and very much needed to eliminate (or at least heavily reduce) long-established racism/bigotry.

But the problem is that a lot of people started to abuse it as a virtue-signalling mechanism and/or a way to justify their jobs, leading to insanities like renaming the Git “master” branch.

I suspect AI safety is the same. There’s a grain of truth and usefulness to it, but no AI safety person will intentionally declare “we figured out how to make models safe, my job here is done”, so they have to always push the envelope, even towards ridiculous levels.

  • stuaxo 5 hours ago

    Isn't political correctness just politeness ?

    Many of the arguments against just seem to come down to "I want to be a jerk".

    • khaki54 3 hours ago

      No. Political correctness in practice is a way to exercise control by shaming people for adhering to long established norms of behavior and vocabulary.

      • BriggyDwiggs42 2 hours ago

        Both of these are unreasonable generalizations. It depends completely on the purpose of the PC-ness, what groups are pushing for it, the cultural context etc.

        • tsevis 2 hours ago

          I agree. For me, political correctness was originally an empathetic code of expression. I’ve never felt the need to provoke or ridicule another group of people. Of course, it did reach a point of hyperbole—where even historic artworks were misread as offensive or racist.

          As the Greeks said: “Μέτρον ἄριστον”—balance is best. We don’t need to provoke just to indulge our worst instincts, but we also need tolerance for expressions that aren’t perfectly curated.

          That said, my article isn’t really about political correctness. It’s about low-quality AI filters that can’t read context, and the corporate shortcuts that rely on them. My point isn’t to rant or complain, but to suggest a new era of content moderation—one that’s smarter, fairer, and more democratic.

    • JustExAWS 33 minutes ago

      FWIW: I’m Black.

      Political correctness goes much further than politeness.

      I was 46 when I entered BigTech (no longer there) in 2020. Of course the famous master vs main. But you were also chastised for saying “you guys” - even though the women said as much as the men, if you didn’t put the proper pronouns under your profile. I got chastised for saying “war room”. I heard an anecdote that now “pow wow” wasn’t allowed.

      One podcast I listen to - Stuff You Should Know - replayed an old episode and added a disclaimer up front apologized because the episode was about pregnancy complications and in the older episode they were being “heteronormative” by not calling out that this issue only affects cisgendered women.

      I’m not saying anyone should be disrespected or I wouldn’t call someone by whatever name or pronoun they prefer.

      I also found all of the “ally” groups, discussion of “micro aggressions” etc groan worthy.

      This is in the DNCs charter

      https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/25/politics/democrats-gender-non...

      > The language now says committees “shall be as equally divided as practicable between men and women (determined by gender self-identification) meaning that the variance between men and women in the group cannot exceed one (1).” Gender nonbinary members will not be counted as either male or female, “and the remainder of the delegation shall be equally divided.”

      Yes I would find this just as bad if the language was about race and someone of mixed race heritage.

      I would much rather hang out with good old, live and let live traditional “guns and church family centered” old school Hank Hill conservatives (even though I’m not one), than the posturing “anti-racist” leftist wing.

bjourne 2 hours ago

Yes. For example, YouTube channels self-censor to an insane degree to avoid getting demonetized. Streamers don't dare saying fuck or shit in case the ai hears them.